Inquiry Driven Systems • Discussion 1

Re: Topos LabMathFoldr Project
Re: Category TheoryValeria de Paiva

Dear Brendan and Valeria,

I’ve been a participant∫observer in web-ontology knowledge projects for a couple of decades and they always give far more attention to knowledge as a product than due reflection on the dynamics of inquiry required to develop our provisional knowledge.  Many such projects have come and gone with the winds of fashion and it’s my guess the lack of balance between process and product orientation is one of the reasons why.

So I’ve been working on that … here’s a few links to the model of knowledge development sketched in my work on Inquiry Driven Systems.

cc: Category TheoryCyberneticsOntologStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | Inquiry Driven SystemsLaws of Form • Peirce List (1) (2) (3)

This entry was posted in Animata, Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Learning Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Peirce, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Inquiry Driven Systems • Discussion 1

  1. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.