Differential Propositional Calculus • Discussion 3

That mathematics, in common with other art forms, can lead us beyond ordinary existence, and can show us something of the structure in which all creation hangs together, is no new idea.  But mathematical texts generally begin the story somewhere in the middle, leaving the reader to pick up the thread as best he can.  Here the story is traced from the beginning.

G. Spencer Brown • Laws of Form

Re: Laws of FormLyle Anderson (1) (2)

Dear Lyle,

Charles S. Peirce, with his x-ray vision, revealed for the first time in graphic detail the mathematical forms structuring our logical organon.  Spencer Brown broadened that perspective in two directions, tracing more clearly than Peirce’s bare foreshadowings the infrastructure of primary arithmetic and hypothesizing the existence of imaginary logical values in a larger algebraic superstructure.

Spencer Brown explored the algebraic extension of the boolean domain \mathbb{B} to a superset equipped with logical imaginaries, operating on analogy with the algebraic extension of the real line \mathbb{R} to the complex plane \mathbb{C}.  Seeing as how complex variables are frequently used to model time domains in physics and engineering, that will continue to be a likely and natural direction of exploration.

My own work, however, led me in a different direction.  There are many different ways of fruitfully extending a given domain.  Aside from the above class of algebraic extensions there is a class of differential extensions and when that proverbial road diverged I took the differential one.

Who knows? maybe on through that undergrowth the roads converge again …


cc: CyberneticsLaws of FormOntolog Forum • Peirce List (1) (2) (3)
cc: FB | Differential LogicStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Computational Complexity, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematical Models, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Time, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Differential Propositional Calculus • Discussion 3

  1. Pingback: Differential Propositional Calculus • Discussion 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Differential Propositional Calculus • Discussion 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Differential Logic and Dynamic Systems • Discussion 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Differential Logic and Dynamic Systems • Discussion 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.