All Process, No Paradox • 7

Unlike more superficial forms of expertise, mathematics is a way of saying less and less about more and more.  A mathematical text is thus not an end in itself, but a key to a world beyond the compass of ordinary description.

G. Spencer Brown • Laws of Form

Re: Laws of FormJames Bowery

Dear James,

Sorry for the sluggish response … but I’ve been slogging through a mass of mindless link repair due to the slew of url-extinctions and url-mutations afflicting our web of maya over the last few years.  I’ve been working to recover-revise my better contributions to the old LoF list along the lines of what Spencer Brown wrote about time and imaginary logical values and the impact it had on my own work with logical graphs from the early days on.

There was a time when I spent a lot of time thinking about the “phenomenology of internal time consciousness” and so on but that was a long time passing.  I think I first learned the word phenomenology from early readings in Bachelard and Sartre but my current take on it is more heavily influenced by subsequent experiences in physics labs and libraries.

Physicists speak of the need to reflect on the circumstance that even our most exalted theories get their first leg up from our “naked eye” perception of “pointer readings”, that is, from the superposition in our visual field of a needle on a graduated dial, or the analogous incidentals in other sensory modes.  As a rule, a working physicist would never think of taking that “observation of obvious” truth in too reductive a sense, since that would lead to sheer sensationalism, and even the purest experimentalist has a better appreciation for the role of theoretical conception than that.

Well, I didn’t know I was going to write this much when I opened the page, but I started remembering experiences and thoughts from the earliest days.  At any rate, I think I’ll blog this on my series about Process and Paradox since that is occupying my mind at present and I wouldn’t want to sidetrack the time-phenomenology line.

Regards,

Jon

cc: CyberneticsLaws of FormOntolog ForumPeirce List
cc: FB | CyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Paradox, Peirce, Process, Process Thinking, Spencer Brown, Systems Theory, Time, Tolkien and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to All Process, No Paradox • 7

  1. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.