Tag Archives: Semiotics

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 19

Posted on October 5, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Normative science rests largely on phenomenology and on mathematics; metaphysics on phenomenology and on normative science. ❧ Charles Sanders Peirce • Collected Papers, CP 1.186 (1903) Syllabus • Classification of Sciences (CP 1.180–202, G-1903-2b) Re: Peirce List • John Sowa JS: … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Minimal Negation Operators • Discussion 2

Posted on October 2, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Minimal Negation Operators • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) Re: Peirce List (1) (2) (3) • Jerry Chandler JC: As a chemist, CSP often inscended hyle terminology into his logical corpse as he sought to extend the 15–17th … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Semiotics, Venn Diagrams, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Minimal Negation Operators • Discussion 1

Posted on September 30, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Minimal Negation Operators • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) Re: Peirce List (1) (2) • Imran Makani IM: In his first post on this thread Jon clearly says that [minimal negation operators] were developed from Peirce’s alpha … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Semiotics, Venn Diagrams, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 18

Posted on September 28, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: FB | Medieval Logic • Edward Buckner (1) (2) Edward Buckner raised a few questions about the sign relations implicit in Aristotle’s treatise “On Interpretation”, prompting the following thoughts on my part. On Pragmata The object of a sign … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 23

Posted on September 21, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Ontolog Forum • Roberto Rovetto • Alex Shkotin Having lost my concentration to another round of home reconstruction disruption, let me loop back to the texts from Roberto and Alex which drew me into this discussion last week. RR: … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 22

Posted on September 16, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Ontolog Forum • Roberto Rovetto (1) (2) RR: What’s your view on: When to create a greater-than-binary relation rather than a binary relation? Consider:  You want to represent some information, statement, or knowledge, without necessarily being forced to limit … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 21

Posted on September 13, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Ontolog Forum • Alex Shkotin AS: Let me underline an important point:  first of all, we have found in nature and society one or another relation and ask how many members each example of this relation can have?  i.e. … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 17

Posted on September 12, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty (1) (2) (3) Dear Robert, I’ve been reviewing the discussions of August on this topic and I think it might be possible to advance our inquiry and even establish new levels of competence in … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

On Reading Peirce • Discussion 2

Posted on September 5, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Jon Awbrey • Gary Richmond JA: Well, it’s true, all science is under construction. But not everything under construction is a science. GR: True.  But I’d suggest that there is no good reason to block the … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Pragmatism, Science, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Reading Peirce • Discussion 1

Posted on September 4, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Jon Awbrey • John Sowa JFS: I detect a prebit of irony in your note. Although I respect Peirce’s ethics of terminology and observe his recommendations when they are appropriate and realistic, I also know that … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Pragmatism, Science, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment