Tag Archives: Peirce

Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 15

Posted on March 11, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

A couple of phrases have stuck in my mind from my earliest days of reading about abductive inference and hypothesis formation.  One has to do with the puzzle of “giving a rule to abduction” and the other alludes to “the reticular … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Analogy, Aristotle, Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Deduction, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems Engineering, Logic, Mental Models, Peirce, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Systems | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 14

Posted on March 9, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Clark Goble • John Collier As far as what gives a rule to abduction, as Peirce styled a question I found echoed in minds of inquiry from W.S. McCulloch to Noam Chomsky, Peirce had already given the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Analogy, Aristotle, Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Deduction, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems Engineering, Logic, Mental Models, Peirce, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Systems | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 13

Posted on March 7, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Doctrine Of Individuals Re: Peirce List • Martin Kettelhut I’ve been calling attention to what Peirce wrote about the “Doctrine of Individuals” (what we’d probably call a theory of individuals) for quite some time.  Just for … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Analogy, Aristotle, Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Deduction, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems Engineering, Logic, Mental Models, Peirce, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Systems | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Homunculomorphisms • 2

Posted on February 12, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: John Baez • The Internal Model Principle There’s a far-ranging discussion that takes off from this point, touching on links among analogical reasoning, arrows and functors, cybernetic images, iconic versus symbolic representations, mental models, systems simulations, etc., and just … Continue reading →

Posted in Analogy, Ashby, Automata, Control Systems, Cybernetics, Homunculi, Homunculomorphisms, Iconicity, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intentionality, Internal Models, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Mental Models, Model Theory, Optimal Control, Peirce, Semiotics, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Homunculomorphisms • 1

Posted on February 11, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: John Baez • The Internal Model Principle Ashby’s book was my own first introduction to cybernetics and I recently returned to his discussion of regulation games in connection with some issues in Peirce’s theory of inquiry. In that context … Continue reading →

Posted in Ashby, Automata, Category Theory, Control, Control Systems, Control Theory, Cybernetics, Homunculi, Homunculomorphisms, Information, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intentionality, Internal Models, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Mental Models, Optimal Control, Peirce, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Problems In Philosophy • 5

Posted on February 10, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Michael Harris • Are Your Colleagues Zombies? What makes a zombie a legitimate object of philosophical inquiry is its absence of consciousness.  And today’s question is whether mathematical research requires consciousness, or whether it could just as well be … Continue reading →

Posted in Aristotle, Automata, Automated Research Tools, Automation, Cognition, Computation, Consciousness, Freud, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intentionality, Mathematics, Mechanization, Michael Harris, Peirce, Philosophy, Philosophy of Mathematics, Philosophy of Mind, Plato, Psychology, Routinization, Socrates, Sophist, Turing Test | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Problems In Philosophy • 3

Posted on February 8, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.D. Mounce Making reality our friend is necessary to survival and finding good descriptions of reality is the better part of doing that, so I don’t imagine we have any less interest in truth than the Ancients.  From what … Continue reading →

Posted in Aesthetics, Computation, Computer Science, Ethics, Heap Problem, Logic, Mathematics, Model Theory, Normative Science, Paradox, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatism, Problem Solving, Proof Theory, Sorites | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Problems In Philosophy • 2

Posted on February 8, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton and K.W. Regan • You Think We Have Problems Classical tradition views logic as a normative science, one whose object is truth.  This puts logic on a par with ethics, whose object is justice or morality in … Continue reading →

Posted in Aesthetics, Algorithms, Animata, Automata, Beauty, C.S. Peirce, Ethics, Inquiry, Justice, Logic, Model Theory, Normative Science, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatism, Problem Solving, Proof Theory, Summum Bonum, Truth, Virtue | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Prospects for Inquiry Driven Systems • 1

Posted on January 22, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

I finally finished retyping the bibliography to my systems engineering proposal that had gotten lost in a move between computers, so here is a link to the OEIS Wiki copy. Prospects for Inquiry Driven Systems • Bibliography This may be of … Continue reading →

Posted in Adaptive Systems, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Educational Systems Design, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems Engineering, Learning, Logic, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Machine Learning, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Reasoning, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Theorem Proving | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 17

Posted on January 4, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussion • HR We have been considering special properties that a dyadic relation may have, in particular, the following two symmetry properties. A dyadic relation is symmetric if being in implies that is in A dyadic relation is … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Dyadic Relations, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce List, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments