Tag Archives: Mathematics

Objects, Models, Theories • 1

Posted on September 10, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Happy Birthday, Charles Sanders Peirce❢ — September 10, 1839 Re: Artem Kaznatcheev • Three Types of Mathematical Models Comment 1 In speaking of models one tends to find denizens of different disciplines talking at cross purposes to one another.  Logicians … Continue reading →

Posted in Adaptive Systems, Analogy, Biological Systems, C.S. Peirce, Information, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Learning Theory, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematical Models, Mathematics, Mental Models, Model Theory, Pragmata, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

The Lambda Point • 1

Posted on August 1, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

A note on the title.  From long ago discussions with Harvey Davis, one of my math professors at Michigan State.  I remember telling him of my interest in the place where algebra, geometry, and logic meet, and he quipped, “Ah … Continue reading →

Posted in Algebra, Amphecks, Boolean Algebra, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Geometry, Graph Theory, Lambda Point, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Is A Theorem That A Human May Prove It?

Posted on June 19, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Gil Kalai • Why Is Mathematics Possible? • Tim Gowers’ Take On The Matter Comment 1 To the extent that mathematics has to do with reasoning about possible existence, or inference from pure hypothesis, a line of thinking going … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Analogy, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Conjecture, Deduction, Epistemology, Hypothesis, Induction, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Peirce, Proof Theory, Retroduction, Theorem Proving, Warren S. McCulloch | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Fourier Transforms of Boolean Functions • 2

Posted on June 4, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton and K.W. Regan • Twin Primes Are Useful Note.  Just another sheet of scratch paper, exploring possible alternatives to the Fourier transforms in the previous post.  As a rule, I like to keep Boolean problems in Boolean … Continue reading →

Posted in Boolean Functions, Computational Complexity, Fourier Transforms, Harmonic Analysis, Logic, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Special Classes of Propositions

Posted on May 31, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Adapted from Differential Propositional Calculus • Special Classes of Propositions A basic proposition, coordinate proposition, or simple proposition in the universe of discourse is one of the propositions in the set Among the propositions in are several families of propositions … Continue reading →

Posted in Boolean Functions, Computational Complexity, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Indication, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Fourier Transforms of Boolean Functions • 1

Posted on May 30, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton and K.W. Regan • Twin Primes Are Useful The problem is concretely about Boolean functions of variables, and seems not to involve prime numbers at all. For any subset of the coordinate [indices], the corresponding Fourier coefficient … Continue reading →

Posted in Boolean Functions, Computational Complexity, Fourier Transforms, Harmonic Analysis, Logic, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

⚠ It’s A Trap ⚠

Posted on May 18, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Kenneth W. Regan • Graduate Student Traps The most common mathematical trap I run across has to do with Triadic Relation Irreducibility, as noted and treated by the polymath C.S. Peirce. This trap lies in the mistaken belief that every … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Descartes, Error, Fallibility, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematical Traps, Mathematics, Peirce, Pragmatism, Reductionism, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Triadic Relation Irreducibility • 3

Posted on May 16, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

References Relation Theory OEIS Wiki • PlanetMath Triadic Relations OEIS Wiki • PlanetMath Sign Relations OEIS Wiki • PlanetMath Relation Composition OEIS Wiki • PlanetMath Relation Construction OEIS Wiki • PlanetMath Relation Reduction OEIS Wiki • PlanetMath Related Readings Notes … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Teridentity, Thirdness, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What It Is

Posted on April 13, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Gil Kalai If I remember my long ago readings well enough, Jimmy the Ancient Greek could lay odds as well as any modern bookmaker on the outcomes of Olympic contests, but that was not really the point of Zeno’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Change, Heraclitus, Infinity, Logic, Mathematics, Motion, Paradox, Parmenides, Phenomenology, Zeno | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Slip Slidin’ Away

Posted on April 11, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

And you give me the choice between a description that is sure but that teaches me nothing and hypotheses that claim to teach me but that are not sure. — Albert Camus • The Myth of Sisyphus Re: R.J. Lipton … Continue reading →

Posted in Albert Camus, C.S. Peirce, Change, Differential Logic, Infinity, Lewis Carroll, Logic, Mathematics, Meno, Modus Ponens, Motion, Paradox, Phenomenology, Sisyphus, Syllogism, Time, Zeno | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments