Category Archives: Differential Logic

All Process, No Paradox • 6

Posted on January 22, 2014 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton • Anti-Social Networks Re: Lou Kauffman • Iterants, Imaginaries, Matrices Comments I made elsewhere about computer science and (anti-)social networks have a connection with the work in progress on this thread, so it may steal a march … Continue reading →

Posted in Algorithms, Amphecks, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Lou Kauffman, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Paradox, Peirce, Process Thinking, Propositional Calculus, Spencer Brown, Systems, Time | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

All Process, No Paradox • 5

Posted on January 21, 2014 by Jon Awbrey

In the midst of this strife, whereat the halls of Ilúvatar shook and a tremor ran out into the silences yet unmoved, Ilúvatar arose a third time, and his face was terrible to behold.  Then he raised up both his … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Paradox, Peirce, Process, Semiotics, Spencer Brown, Systems Theory, Tertium Quid, Time, Tolkien | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

All Process, No Paradox • 4

Posted on January 20, 2014 by Jon Awbrey

Thus began the Days of the Bliss of Valinor; and thus began also the Count of Time. Tolkien • Quenta Silmarillion While looking for something else on the web, I ran across an old note I had written in reply … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, C.S. Peirce, Conceptual Graphs, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Paradox, Peirce, Process, Process Thinking, Spencer Brown, Systems Theory, Time, Tolkien | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

All Process, No Paradox • 3

Posted on January 17, 2014 by Jon Awbrey

Consider what effects that might conceivably have practical bearings you conceive the objects of your conception to have.  Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object. Charles S. Peirce • “Issues of Pragmaticism” … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Paradox, Peirce, Pragmatic Maxim, Process Thinking, Spencer Brown, Systems, Time, Tolkien | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

All Process, No Paradox • 2

Posted on January 15, 2014 by Jon Awbrey

These are the forms of time, which imitates eternity and revolves according to a law of number. Plato • Timaeus Re: Lou Kauffman • Iterants, Imaginaries, Matrices As serendipity would have it, Lou Kauffman, who knows a lot about the … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Lou Kauffman, Mathematics, Paradox, Peirce, Plato, Process, Spencer Brown, Timaeus, Time | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

All Process, No Paradox • 1

Posted on January 13, 2014 by Jon Awbrey

This thing all things devours: Birds, beasts, trees, flowers; Gnaws iron, bites steel; Grinds hard stones to meal; Slays king, ruins town, And beats high mountain down. Tolkien • The Hobbit Talking about time is a waste of time.  Time … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Paradox, Peirce, Process, Process Thinking, Spencer Brown, Systems Theory, Time, Tolkien | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 7

Posted on December 19, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton and K.W. Regan • Theorems From Physics? In a way, the relation between “physics space” and “information space” is one of the topics I address in my work on inquiry driven systems.  Here is a pertinent place in … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 6

Posted on December 6, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Alpha Now, Omega Later • Theorems From Physics? • Isomorphism Is Where It’s At In the late 1970s a number of problems in combinatorics and graph theory that I really wanted to know the answers to had driven me … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 5

Posted on December 4, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton and K.W. Regan • Isomorphism Is Where It’s At “Are there more good cases of isomorphism to study?” Just off the top of my head, a couple of examples come to mind. Sign Relations.  In computational settings, … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 4

Posted on December 3, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Cristopher Moore on Theorems From Physics? It is critically important to distinguish between the objective landscape, the boolean functions as mathematical objects, and the syntactic landscape, the particular formal language we are using as a propositional calculus to denote … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments