Higher Order Sign Relations • 1

Higher Order Sign Relations • Introduction

When interpreters reflect on their use of signs they require an appropriate technical language in which to pursue their reflections.  They need signs referring to sign relations, signs referring to elements and components of sign relations, and signs referring to properties and classes of sign relations.  The orders of signs developing as reflection evolves can be organized under the heading of “higher order signs” and the reflective sign relations involving them can be referred to as “higher order sign relations”.

Some years ago I was formatting my old dissertation proposal on Inquiry Driven Systems for the web when the subject of “signs about signs” arose on the Peirce List.  It called to mind the part of my document on Higher Order Sign Relations, on which basis Reflective Interpretive Frameworks are constructed, and the introduction to which begins as above.

Resources

cc: Academia.edu • BlueSky • Laws of Form • Mathstodon • Research Gate
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Recursion, Reflection, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Type Theory and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Higher Order Sign Relations • 1

  1. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 7 | Systems Community of Inquiry

  6. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 6 | Systems Community of Inquiry

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.