Theory and Therapy of Representations • 4

Re: Theory and Therapy of Representations • 3
Re: Ontolog ForumPaola Di Maio

JA:
What are the forces distorting our representations of what’s observed, what’s expected, and what’s intended?
PDM:
The short answer is …. the force behind all distortions is our own unenlightened mind, and all the shortfalls this comes with.

I think that’s true, we have to keep reflecting on the state of our personal enlightenments.  If we can do that without losing our heads and our systems thinking caps, there will be much we can do to promote the general Enlightenment of the State.

On both personal and general grounds we have a stake in the projects of self‑governing systems — whether it is possible for them to exist and what it takes for them to thrive in given environments.  Systems on that order have of course been studied from many points of view and at many levels of organization.  Whether we address them under the names of adaptive, cybernetic, error-correcting, intelligent, or optimal control systems they all must be capable to some degree of learning, reasoning, and self‑guidance.

Resources

cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsLaws of FormOntolog Forum
cc: FB | CyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Cybernetics, Democracy, Economics, Education, Expectation, Governance, Information, Inquiry, Intention, Justice, Law, Logic, Observation, Plato, Representation, Science, Semiosis, Semiotics, Society, Statistics, Virtue and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Theory and Therapy of Representations • 4

  1. Pingback: Survey of Cybernetics • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Cybernetics • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Cybernetics • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Cybernetics • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.