C.S. Peirce and Category Theory • 7

Re: Category TheoryHenry Story

I’d be very interested in the comments of people who know about Peirce on the two chapters in the book Diagrammatic Immanence I linked to above on “3. Peirce” and “4. Diagrams of Variation : Functor Categories and Presheaves”.  The chapter on Presheaves has some good intuitions on how to explain them that I recognise from studying them a year ago.  At the end of that chapter the author Rocco Gangle argues that Peirce’s diagrams can be modelled in terms of Category Theory.  I would have expected a long list of articles to follow to underwrite that claim.  Perhaps this is all well known in Peirce or CT circles …

Dear Henry,

Things are a little calmer in my neck of the woods at the moment so I’m paddling back up Peirce Bayou to clear up some of the points I missed during last week’s tempest and root canal.  An hour’s expedition through Amazon’s creeks and tributaries finally turned up a pearl of not too great a price so far as Diagrammatic Immanence goes so I tumbled for a paperback edition to arrive in a couple of weeks but the purchase lets me read it on Kindle right away.  So I’ll be perusing that …

cc: Category TheoryCyberneticsOntologStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | Peirce MattersLaws of Form

This entry was posted in Abstraction, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Phenomenology, Pragmatic Maxim, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Triadic Relations, Triadicity, Type Theory and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.