Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Comment 12.3
We now have two ways of computing a logical involution raising a dyadic relative term to the power of a monadic absolute term, for example, for “lover of every woman”.
The first method applies set-theoretic operations to the extensions of absolute and relative terms, expressing the denotation of the term as the intersection of a set of relational applications.
The second method operates in the matrix representation, expressing the value of the matrix at an argument
as a product of coefficient powers.
Abstract formulas like these are more easily grasped with the aid of a concrete example and a picture of the relations involved.
Involution Example 1
Consider a universe of discourse subject to the following data.
Figure 55 shows the placement of within
and the placement of
within
To highlight the role of more clearly, the Figure represents the absolute term
by means of the relative term
which conveys the same information.
Computing the denotation of by way of the class intersection formula, we can show our work as follows.
With the above Figure in mind, we can visualize the computation of as follows.
- Pick a specific
in the bottom row of the Figure.
- Pan across the elements
in the middle row of the Figure.
- If
links to
then
otherwise
- If
in the middle row links to
in the top row then
otherwise
- Compute the value
for each
in the middle row.
- If any of the values
is
then the product
is
otherwise it is
As a general observation, we know the value of goes to
just as soon as we find a
such that
and
in other words, such that
but
If there is no such
then
Running through the program for each the only case producing a non-zero result is
That portion of the work can be sketched as follows.
Resources
- Peirce’s 1870 Logic of Relatives • Part 1 • Part 2 • Part 3 • References
- Logic Syllabus • Relational Concepts • Relation Theory • Relative Term
cc: Cybernetics • Ontolog Forum • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
cc: FB | Peirce Matters • Laws of Form • Peirce List (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Overview | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Comment 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry