The Present Is Big With The Future

Now that I have proved sufficiently that everything comes to pass according to determinate reasons, there cannot be any more difficulty over these principles of God’s foreknowledge.  Although these determinations do not compel, they cannot but be certain, and they foreshadow what shall happen.

It is true that God sees all at once the whole sequence of this universe, when he chooses it, and that thus he has no need of the connexion of effects and causes in order to foresee these effects.  But since his wisdom causes him to choose a sequence in perfect connexion, he cannot but see one part of the sequence in the other.

It is one of the rules of my system of general harmony, that the present is big with the future, and that he who sees all sees in that which is that which shall be.

What is more, I have proved conclusively that God sees in each portion of the universe the whole universe, owing to the perfect connexion of things.  He is infinitely more discerning than Pythagoras, who judged the height of Hercules by the size of his footprint.  There must therefore be no doubt that effects follow their causes determinately, in spite of contingency and even of freedom, which nevertheless exist together with certainty or determination.

Gottfried Wilhelm (Freiherr von) Leibniz, Theodicy : Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man, and the Origin of Evil, edited with an introduction by Austin Farrer, translated by E.M. Huggard from C.J. Gerhardt’s edition of the Collected Philosophical Works, 1875–1890.  Routledge 1951.  Open Court 1985.  Paragraph 360, page 341.

This entry was posted in Causality, Certainty, Chance, Contingency, Determination, Determinism, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Evil, Free Will, Freedom, Hologrammautomaton, Infinitesimals, Leibniz, Preëstablished Harmony, Theodicy and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to The Present Is Big With The Future

  1. This part of the quote would be much more readable with a couple of extra commas: “that he who sees all sees[,] in that which is[,] that which shall be.”

    • Jon Awbrey says:

      Sure, though I might have gone with breathing commas like, “he who sees all, sees in that which is, that which shall be”, but I had to leave it as my source gave it.

  2. Pingback: The Present Is Big With The Future • Comment 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: History, Its Arc, Its Tangents • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: The Present Is Big With The Future • Comment 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  6. Pingback: Frankl, My Dear • 12 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  7. Pingback: Differential Propositional Calculus • Discussion 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  8. Pingback: Definition and Determination • 22 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  9. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  10. Pingback: Inquiry Driven Systems • Discussion 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  11. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.