Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 7
Re: Academia.edu • Milo Gardner
- MG:
- Peirce sensed that bivalent syntax was superceded by trivalent syntax,
but never resolved that nagging question.
The main thing is not a question of syntax but a question of the mathematical models we use to cope with object realities and real objectives (pragmata). Signs, syntax, and systems of representation can make a big difference in how well they represent the object domain and how well they serve the purpose at hand but they remain accessory to those objects and purposes.
cc: Inquiry Driven Systems • Laws of Form • Mathstodon • Academia.edu
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
An important additional consideration might be the ability of receivers to receive and properly interprete (understand?) the representation?
Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry