Pragmatic Semiotic Information • Discussion 21

Re: FB | Medieval LogicKollbjorn OldtheynEdward Buckner

On the question of which later developments in logic Peirce anticipated, I’ve been more focused on the points where he saw through to features we would not see again until the theories of categories, computation, and information began to make their impact on our conceptions of logic.  I’ll dig up some links along those lines …

Resources

cc: CyberneticsLaws of FormOntolog ForumStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Abduction, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Deduction, Definition, Determination, Extension, Hypothesis, Induction, Inference, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Intention, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Measurement, Observation, Peirce, Perception, Phenomenology, Physics, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Pragmatism, Probability, Quantum Mechanics, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Sign Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Pragmatic Semiotic Information • Discussion 21

  1. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.