Tag Archives: Semiosis

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 21

Re: Ontolog Forum • Alex Shkotin AS: Let me underline an important point:  first of all, we have found in nature and society one or another relation and ask how many members each example of this relation can have?  i.e. … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 17

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty (1) (2) (3) Dear Robert, I’ve been reviewing the discussions of August on this topic and I think it might be possible to advance our inquiry and even establish new levels of competence in … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 16

Re: FB | Semeiotics • Marius V. Constantin MVC: Have you taken into consideration the difference between weak negation and strong negation? I always begin classically where logic is concerned — I guess that means “strong” negation — we make … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 15

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty (quoted) RM: I persist in the idea that in your six combinations [O, S, I] only one is relevant for semiotics, the others being out of the field […] On the projections, there is also … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 14

Re: Animated Logical Graphs • 81 Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 13 Topics arising in various circles I traverse on the web are flashing me back to my earliest influences in the ways of inquiry driven systems.  Dick … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 13

Re: Category Theory • Peiyuan Zhu • Henry Story Dear Peiyuan, Henry … Way back during my first foundations + identity crisis I explored every alternative, deviant, non-standard version of logic and set theory I could scrape up — I remember … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 12

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty (quoted) RM: I persist in the idea that in your six combinations [O, S, I] only one is relevant for semiotics, the others being out of the field […] On the projections, there is also … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 4

ah, what do mathematicians know of life’s exigency? proof is our rock and our soul necessity. we don’t just make abstractions, we are abstractions. it’s coffee and doughnuts all the way down … no one disturbs our vain diagrams till … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 11

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty RM: You evoke many concepts with their relations, the explanation of which would take a considerable amount of time, to the point that you are reduced to answering yourself.  I want to question you … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 20

Re: Information = Comprehension × Extension Re: Category Theory • Morgan Rogers MR: Care to make any of this more precise? [The above] formula, for example? Yes, it will take some care to make it all more precise, and I’ve … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments