Author Archives: Jon Awbrey

Basal Ingredients Of Society • Comment 2

Re: Michael Hays • How to Fix the College Debt Problem The rationale for Universal Free Public Education is that a certain level of education is necessary for a person to function as a full-fledged citizen in a well-tempered and … Continue reading →

Posted in Adaptability, Cybernetics, Democracy, Economics, Education, Evolution, Governance, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Learning Organizations, Learning Society, Politics, Reciprocity, Rousseau, Social Compact, Sustainability | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Basal Ingredients Of Society • Comment 1

What was it called? — spinthariscope? — it came from a science kit I got as a kid … I might as well jump in medias res … Re: Michael Hays • How to Fix the College Debt Problem Better … Continue reading →

Posted in Adaptability, Cybernetics, Democracy, Economics, Education, Evolution, Governance, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Learning Organizations, Learning Society, Politics, Reciprocity, Rousseau, Social Compact, Sustainability | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Basal Ingredients Of Society • Prologue

I settled on the acronym BIOS to suggest the vital elements of life in society, a life in association with others, and not just any association but one whose flickers of life are sustained for more than a few vicissitudes … Continue reading →

Posted in Adaptability, Cybernetics, Democracy, Economics, Education, Evolution, Governance, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Learning Organizations, Learning Society, Politics, Reciprocity, Rousseau, Social Compact, Sustainability | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Pedagogy and Phrenology

Re: Gene V Glass • Why I Am No Longer a Measurement Specialist When I was learning research statistics, the standard cautionary tale on construct validity featured the foibles of Phrenology, the onetime pseudoscience that sought to psych out a … Continue reading →

Posted in Assessment, Construct Validity, Education, Measurement, Pedagogy, Phrenology, Statistics, Testing | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Quiz Biz

When I taught undergrad math, I told my students that tests were simply a means of communication between student and teacher designed to guide the instruction process, that it was a matter of some inconvenience that third parties had taken … Continue reading →

Posted in Assessment, Communication, Dialogue, Education, Inquiry, Learning, Pedagogy, Teaching, Testing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Comment 7

Re: Peirce List I still have in mind trying to show how the principle I dubbed the Zeroth Law Of Semiotics can help us see what is really going on with a number of old puzzles like the Liar Paradox, … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Denotation, Epimenides, Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Nominalism, Peirce, Peirce List, Pragmatics, Pragmatism, Rhetoric, Semantics, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Syntax, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Comment 6

Re: Peirce List By way of orientation to the task at hand, we are investigating a type of slippage that occurs in the gap between natural language, with the natural assumptions it has evolved to take for granted, rightly or … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Denotation, Epimenides, Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Nominalism, Peirce, Pragmatics, Pragmatism, Rhetoric, Semantics, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Syntax, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Comment 5

Re: Peirce List It may be a day or two before I can get back to the zeroth law of semiotics and how grasping it cures a strain of ills that language and some fashions of logic are heir to, … Continue reading →

Posted in Denotation, Epimenides, Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Nominalism, Peirce, Peirce List, Pragmatics, Pragmatism, Rhetoric, Semantics, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Syntax, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Comment 4

Re: Peirce List • Sungchul Ji General terms are terms like man, woman, child, etc., each of which applies to many individuals, in other words, has a general denotation or a plural extension.  Generally speaking, a general term is treated … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Denotation, Epimenides, Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Nominalism, Peirce, Pragmatics, Pragmatism, Rhetoric, Semantics, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Syntax, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Comment 3

Re: Peirce List • Tom Wyrick Nominalism takes its name from the idea that “generals are only names” and it goes by the maxims “Do not take a general name for the name of a general” and “Do not multiply entities … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Denotation, Extension, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Nominalism, Peirce, Pragmatics, Rhetoric, Semantics, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Syntax, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments