Survey of Theme One Program • 6

This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts relating to the Theme One Program I worked on all through the 1980s.  The aim was to develop fundamental algorithms and data structures for integrating empirical learning with logical reasoning.  I had earlier developed separate programs for basic components of those tasks, namely, 2-level formal language learning and propositional constraint satisfaction, the latter using an extension of C.S. Peirce’s logical graphs as a syntax for propositional logic.  Thus arose the question of how well it might be possible to get “empiricist” and “rationalist” modes of operation to cooperate.  The long-term vision is the design and implementation of an Automated Research Tool able to double as a platform for Inquiry Driven Education.

Wiki Hub

Documentation

Blog Series

Blog Dialogs

Applications

References

  • Awbrey, S.M., and Awbrey, J.L. (May 1991), “An Architecture for Inquiry • Building Computer Platforms for Discovery”, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technology and Education, Toronto, Canada, pp. 874–875.  Online.
  • Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (January 1991), “Exploring Research Data Interactively • Developing a Computer Architecture for Inquiry”, Poster presented at the Annual Sigma Xi Research Forum, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
  • Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (August 1990), “Exploring Research Data Interactively • Theme One : A Program of Inquiry”, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Applications of Artificial Intelligence and CD-ROM in Education and Training, Society for Applied Learning Technology, Washington, DC, pp. 9–15.  Online.

cc: FB | Theme One ProgramLaws of FormMathstodonAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Algorithms, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cognition, Computation, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Data Structures, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Formal Languages, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Learning Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Spencer Brown, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

35 Responses to Survey of Theme One Program • 6

  1. Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Theme One Program • Motivation 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Theme One Program • Motivation 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Theme One Program • Motivation 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  6. Pingback: Theme One Program • Motivation 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  7. Pingback: Theme One Program • Motivation 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  8. Pingback: Theme One Program • Motivation 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  9. Pingback: Theme One Program • Exposition 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  10. Pingback: Theme One Program • Exposition 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  11. Pingback: Theme One Program • Exposition 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  12. Pingback: Theme One Program • Exposition 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  13. Pingback: Theme One Program • Exposition 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  14. Pingback: Theme One Program • Exposition 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  15. Pingback: Theme One Program • Exposition 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  16. Pingback: Theme One Program • Exposition 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  17. Pingback: Theme One Program • Exposition 9 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  18. Pingback: Theme One Program • Jets and Sharks 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  19. Pingback: Theme One Program • Jets and Sharks 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  20. Pingback: Theme One Program • Jets and Sharks 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  21. Pingback: Differential Logic • Discussion 14 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  22. Pingback: Cactus Language • Overview 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  23. Pingback: Cactus Language • Overview 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  24. Pingback: Cactus Language • Overview 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  25. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  26. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  27. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  28. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  29. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  30. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  31. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  32. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  33. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 9 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  34. Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  35. Pingback: Cactus Language • Discussion 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.