Re: Systems Science • Joseph Simpson
One thing I added to the current Survey of Animated Logical Graphs is an earlier report titled “Futures Of Logical Graphs” (FOLG), which takes up a number of difficult issues in more detail than I’ve found the ability or audacity to do since. Among other things, it gives an indication of the steps I took from trees to cacti in the graph-theoretic representation of logical propositions and boolean functions, along with the forces driving that transition.
A lot of the text goes back to the dusty old Ascii days of the discussion lists where I last shared it, so I’ll be working on converting the figures and tables and trying to make the presentation more understandable.
cc: Cybernetics (1) (2) • Peirce (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)
cc: Ontolog Forum (1) (2) • Structural Modeling (1) (2) • Systems Science (1) (2)
cc: FB | Logical Graphs • Laws of Form
Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Differential Propositional Calculus • Discussion 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Animated Logical Graphs • 67 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Animated Logical Graphs • 68 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry