Definition and Determination • 13

Re: Peirce List (1) (2)
Re: Jerry Rhee (1) (2)

Verbal acrobatics can get a person only so far, even for a high-wire act like C.S. Peirce, and all the great failures to launch I’ve seen pragmatism and semiotics suffer from during the last century come about because people have a habit of getting waylaid in à priori armchair delicatessen methods of fixing their beliefs in premature contentments.

When it’s time to deal with real experimental data and realistic practical applications then there is no help for it but wrestling with the mathematical structures of triadic sign relations and relations in general.

Resources

cc: Inquiry List • Peirce List (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Constraint, Definition, Determination, Extension, Form, Indication, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Peirce, Semiotics, Structure and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Definition and Determination • 13

  1. Pingback: Definition and Determination : 14 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Definition and Determination • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.