Re: Peirce List • Helmut Raulien
The divisor of relation signified by is a dyadic relation on the set of positive integers
and thus may be understood as a subset of the cartesian product
It is an example of a partial order, while the less than or equal to relation signified by
is an example of a total order relation.
The mathematics of relations can be applied most felicitously to semiotics but there we must bump the adicity or arity up to three. We take any sign relation to be subset of a cartesian product
where
is the set of objects under consideration in a given discussion,
is the set of signs, and
is the set of interpretant signs involved in the same discussion.
One thing we need to understand is the sign relation relevant to a given level of discussion may be rather more abstract than what we would call a sign process proper, that is, a structure extended through a dimension of time. Indeed, many of the most powerful sign relations generate sign processes through iteration or recursion or similar operations. In that event, the most penetrating analysis of the sign process or semiosis in view is achieved through grasping the generative sign relation at its core.
Resources
cc: Category Theory • Cybernetics • Ontolog • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
cc: FB | Relation Theory • Laws of Form • Peirce List
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Relations & Their Relatives • Review 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry