Triadic Relations, Intentions, Fuzzy Subsets : 2

We imagine all the things we might want to talk about in a given discussion as collected together in a set X called a universe of discourse.  (In probabilistic or statistical work it might be called a sample space.)

By way of shorthand notation, let us single out two domains of values, the boolean domain ℬ = {0, 1} and the unit interval ℐ = [0, 1].

In many applications, especially computational or statistical ones, it is often useful to represent any given subset S of X by means of a function from X to ℬ known as the characteristic function or indicator function of S in X.

By way of notation, we write fS : X → ℬ for the indicator function of S in X, and define it as follows:

fS(x) = 1   if and only if   x is an element of S.

All that is standard notions from ordinary set theory.

Fuzzy sets, more properly, fuzzy subsets of a given set X will be defined in a way that generalizes the target values in the previous definition from the boolean values in ℬ to the real values in ℐ.

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy Sets, Intentional Contexts, Intentional Objects, Intentionality, Intentions, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Lotfi Zadeh, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.