Category Archives: Sign Relations

Definition and Determination • 16

Posted on April 22, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Ontolog Forum • Richard McCullough RM:  What is your view of definitions? A recurring question, always worth some thought, so I added my earlier comment to a long-running series on my blog concerned with Definition and Determination. Survey of Definition … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Constraint, Definition, Determination, Extension, Form, Geometry, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Indication, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intension, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Definition and Determination • 15

Posted on April 21, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Ontolog Forum • Richard McCullough In some early math course I learned a fourfold scheme of Primitives (undefined terms), Definitions, Axioms, and Inference Rules.  But later excursions tended to run the axioms and definitions together, speaking for example of … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Constraint, Definition, Determination, Extension, Form, Geometry, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Indication, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intension, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Inquiry Driven Systems • Comment 2

Posted on February 21, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

I just got reminded of an earlier blog post that more or less fits here.  It links to the bibliography I had in hand and mind when I went back to graduate school in systems engineering to synthesize all the … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Learning Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Peirce, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Inquiry Driven Systems • Comment 1

Posted on February 18, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Daniel Everett • Edwina Taborsky The role of acquired knowledge bases in inquiry, learning, and reasoning is discussed in the following article and sections. Introduction to Inquiry Driven Systems Inquiry Learning Transfer Testing cc: Peirce List … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Knowledge Bases, Learning, Logic, Peirce, Reasoning, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Sign Relations • Comment 12

Posted on February 17, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Ontolog Discussion • HP In the Peirce universe “the role that human institutions play in establishing grounding and associated frames of reference and standards” (Hans Polzer) is articulated by reference to “communities of inquiry” and “communities of interpretation”.  Invoking … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic of Relatives, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , | 16 Comments

Sign Relations • Comment 11

Posted on February 14, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Jon Alan Schmidt When you ask a question about what something is, you are asking a question about its ontology.  But signhood is not a matter of ontology, it is a form of relation. Re: Peirce … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic of Relatives, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , | 15 Comments

Sign Relations • Comment 10

Posted on February 9, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • John Sowa Three-Headed Dogs and Triadic Sign Relations Peirce’s “Sop to Cerberus” got tossed about quite a bit in our discussions across the Web this millennium.  Here’s a record of one occasion from the days when … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic of Relatives, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , | 16 Comments

{ Information = Comprehension × Extension } • Discussion 7

Posted on February 2, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Joselle DiNunzio Kehoe • Information and Questions of Consciousness C.S. Peirce put forth the idea that what he called “the laws of information” were key to solving “the puzzle of the validity of scientific inference” and thus to understanding … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Consciousness, Deduction, Extension, Hypothesis, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Scientific Method, Semiotic Information, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Sign Relations • Comment 9

Posted on January 18, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Facebook Discussion • CJ Yes, that’s the idea. Descriptive semiotics needs formal models for describing any sort of sign-using conduct, whether conducted by humans, life-forms, machines, or sign-using systems in general. Normative semiotics, also known as logic, inquires into … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic of Relatives, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , | 16 Comments

Sign Relations • Comment 8

Posted on January 17, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Semiotic Triangle • JC Peirce being prickly as usual his distinctions all tend toward tri-stinctions and on this field he wields his trident:  Tone, Token, Type. Here’s a link to a few pertinent passages: Tone, Token, Type

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic of Relatives, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , | 16 Comments