Category Archives: Semiotics

In the Way of Inquiry • Obstacles

Posted on January 7, 2023 by Jon Awbrey

Upon this first, and in one sense this sole, rule of reason, that in order to learn you must desire to learn, and in so desiring not be satisfied with what you already incline to think, there follows one corollary … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

In the Way of Inquiry • Recircus

Posted on January 6, 2023 by Jon Awbrey

I must lie down where all the ladders start In the foul rag and bone shop of the heart. — W.B. Yeats I have in mind circling back to a point in my project on Inquiry Driven Systems, namely, the chapter … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Discussion 4

Posted on December 25, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • All Liar, No Paradox Re: FB | Pattern Languages for Systemic Transformation • Esteban Trev JA: A statement asserts that a statement is a statement that is false. The statement violates an axiom of … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Denotation, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Nominalism, Pragmatic Maxim, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Discussion 3

Posted on December 14, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • All Liar, No Paradox Re: FB | Charles S. Peirce Society • Kent Olson KO: The liar paradox is a self-referential paradox, yes? I think Russell answered these. Dear Kent, Russell had no inkling … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Denotation, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Nominalism, Pragmatic Maxim, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Sign Relational Manifolds • Discussion 3

Posted on November 11, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Re: FB | Paradoxology • Alex Shkotin   AS: I see — “sign relation” is a special term for triadic relations of some kind (with some properties);  like this:  thing in first position and thing in second position must refer … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Differential Geometry, Differential Logic, Geometry, Interoperability, Logic, Manifolds, Mathematics, Riemann, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Sign Relational Manifolds • Discussion 2

Posted on November 7, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Re: FB | Paradoxology • Alex Shkotin   AS: Not on a narrow topic, but maybe you have a desire to answer. Hypothesis.  Any material something can be a sign. Is it possible to give an example of something material … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Differential Geometry, Differential Logic, Geometry, Interoperability, Logic, Manifolds, Mathematics, Riemann, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Sign Relational Manifolds • Discussion 1

Posted on November 7, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Semiotic Orbits, Manifolds, Arcs The arc of the semiotic universe is long but it bends towards universal harmony. Re: FB | Semiotics, Books, Links, News • What’s at the End of a Chain of Interpretants? Semiotic manifolds, like physical and … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Differential Geometry, Differential Logic, Geometry, Interoperability, Logic, Manifolds, Mathematics, Riemann, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Sign Relational Manifolds • 5

Posted on November 6, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Let me try to say in intuitive terms what I think is really going on here. The problem we face is as old as the problem of other minds, or intersubjectivity, or even commensurability, and it naturally involves a whole … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Differential Geometry, Differential Logic, Geometry, Interoperability, Logic, Manifolds, Mathematics, Riemann, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Sign Relational Manifolds • 4

Posted on November 5, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Another set of notes I found on this theme strikes me as getting to the point more quickly and though they read a little rough in places I think it may be worth the effort to fill out their general … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Differential Geometry, Differential Logic, Geometry, Interoperability, Logic, Manifolds, Mathematics, Riemann, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Sign Relational Manifolds • 3

Posted on November 3, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

I’m not sure when it was I first noticed the relationship between manifolds and semiotics but I distinctly recall the passage in Serge Lang’s Differential and Riemannian Manifolds which brought the triadic character of tangent vectors into high relief.  I … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Differential Geometry, Differential Logic, Geometry, Intentionality, Logic, Manifolds, Mathematics, Riemann, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments