Category Archives: C.S. Peirce

Differential Logic • 6

Differential Expansions of Propositions Panoptic View • Difference Maps In the previous post we computed what is variously described as the difference map, the difference proposition, or the local proposition of the proposition at the point where and In the … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Differential Logic • 5

Differential Expansions of Propositions Worm’s Eye View Let’s run through the initial example again, keeping an eye on the meanings of the formulas which develop along the way.  We begin with a proposition or a boolean function whose venn diagram … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Differential Logic • 4

Differential Expansions of Propositions Bird’s Eye View An efficient calculus for the realm of logic represented by boolean functions and elementary propositions makes it feasible to compute the finite differences and the differentials of those functions and propositions. For example, … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Differential Logic • 3

Cactus Language for Propositional Logic (cont.) Table 1 shows the cactus graphs, the corresponding cactus expressions, their logical meanings under the so‑called existential interpretation, and their translations into conventional notations for a sample of basic propositional forms. Table 1. Syntax … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Differential Logic • 2

Cactus Language for Propositional Logic The development of differential logic is facilitated by having a moderately efficient calculus in place at the level of boolean‑valued functions and elementary logical propositions.  One very efficient calculus on both conceptual and computational grounds … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Differential Logic • 1

Introduction Differential logic is the component of logic whose object is the description of variation — focusing on the aspects of change, difference, distribution, and diversity — in universes of discourse subject to logical description.  A definition that broad naturally … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Differential Logic • Overview

A reader once told me “venn diagrams are obsolete” and of course we all know how unwieldy they become as our universes of discourse expand beyond four or five dimensions.  Indeed, one of the first lessons I learned when I … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Topology, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Sign Relations • Graphical Representations

The dyadic components of sign relations have graph‑theoretic representations, as digraphs (or directed graphs), which provide concise pictures of their structural and potential dynamic properties. By way of terminology, a directed edge is called an arc from point to point … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Connotation, Denotation, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotic Equivalence Relations, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Sign Relations • Semiotic Equivalence Relations 2

A few items of notation are useful in discussing equivalence relations in general and semiotic equivalence relations in particular. In general, if is an equivalence relation on a set then every element of belongs to a unique equivalence class under … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Connotation, Denotation, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotic Equivalence Relations, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Sign Relations • Semiotic Equivalence Relations 1

A semiotic equivalence relation (SER) is a special type of equivalence relation arising in the analysis of sign relations.  Generally speaking, any equivalence relation induces a partition of the underlying set of elements, known as the domain or space of the … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Connotation, Denotation, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotic Equivalence Relations, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments