Survey of Theme One Program • 7

This is a Survey of resources relating to the Theme One Program I worked on all through the 1980s.  The aim was to develop fundamental algorithms and data structures for integrating empirical learning with logical reasoning.  I had earlier developed separate programs for basic components of those tasks, in particular, two‑level formal language learning and propositional constraint satisfaction, the latter using an extension of C.S. Peirce’s logical graphs as a syntax for propositional logic.  Thus arose the question of how well it might be possible to get “empiricist” and “rationalist” modes of operation to cooperate.  The long‑term vision is the implementation of an Automated Research Tool able to double as a platform for Inquiry Driven Education.

Wiki Hub

Documentation

Blog Series

Blog Dialogs

Applications

References

  • Awbrey, S.M., and Awbrey, J.L. (May 1991), “An Architecture for Inquiry • Building Computer Platforms for Discovery”, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technology and Education, Toronto, Canada, pp. 874–875.  Online.
  • Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (January 1991), “Exploring Research Data Interactively • Developing a Computer Architecture for Inquiry”, Poster presented at the Annual Sigma Xi Research Forum, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
  • Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (August 1990), “Exploring Research Data Interactively • Theme One : A Program of Inquiry”, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Applications of Artificial Intelligence and CD-ROM in Education and Training, Society for Applied Learning Technology, Washington, DC, pp. 9–15.  Online.

cc: FB | Theme One ProgramLaws of FormMathstodonAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Algorithms, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Data Structures, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Formal Languages, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Learning Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

80 Responses to Survey of Theme One Program • 7

  1. Pingback: Cactus Language • Discussion 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Cactus Language • Overview 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Cactus Language • Overview 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Cactus Language • Overview 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  6. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  7. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  8. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  9. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  10. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  11. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  12. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  13. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 9 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  14. Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  15. Pingback: Cactus Language • Discussion 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  16. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  17. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 10 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  18. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 11 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  19. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 12 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  20. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 13 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  21. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 14 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  22. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 15 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  23. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 16 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  24. Pingback: Cactus Language • Preliminaries 17 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  25. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  26. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  27. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  28. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  29. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  30. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  31. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  32. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  33. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 9 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  34. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 10 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  35. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 11 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  36. Pingback: Cactus Language • Syntax 12 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  37. Pingback: Generalities About Formal Grammars • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  38. Pingback: Generalities About Formal Grammars • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  39. Pingback: Generalities About Formal Grammars • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  40. Pingback: Cactus Language • Stylistics 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  41. Pingback: Cactus Language • Stylistics 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  42. Pingback: Cactus Language • Stylistics 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  43. Pingback: Cactus Language • Stylistics 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  44. Pingback: Cactus Language • Stylistics 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  45. Pingback: Cactus Language • Stylistics 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  46. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  47. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  48. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  49. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  50. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  51. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  52. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  53. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  54. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 9 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  55. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 10 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  56. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 11 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  57. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 12 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  58. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 13 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  59. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 14 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  60. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 15 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  61. Pingback: Cactus Language • Pragmatics 16 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  62. Pingback: Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 17 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  63. Pingback: Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 18 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  64. Pingback: Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 19 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  65. Pingback: Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 20 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  66. Pingback: Cactus Language • Mechanics 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  67. Pingback: Cactus Language • Discussion 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  68. Pingback: Cactus Language • Mechanics 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  69. Pingback: Cactus Language • Mechanics 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  70. Pingback: Cactus Language • Mechanics 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  71. Pingback: Cactus Language • Mechanics 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  72. Pingback: Cactus Language • Semantics 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  73. Pingback: Cactus Language • Semantics 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  74. Pingback: Cactus Language • Semantics 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  75. Pingback: Cactus Language • Semantics 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  76. Pingback: Cactus Language • Semantics 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  77. Pingback: Cactus Language • Semantics 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  78. Pingback: Cactus Language • Semantics 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  79. Pingback: Cactus Language • Semantics 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  80. Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 5 | Systems Community of Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.