Logical Graphs • Discussion 5

Posted on August 28, 2023 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Logical Graphs • First Impressions
Re: Facebook • Daniel Everett

DE:
Nice discussion.  Development of icon-based reasoning

As it happens, even though Peirce’s systems of logical graphs do have iconic features, their real power over other sorts of logical diagrams (like venn diagrams) is due to their deeper symbolic character.  Thereby will hang many tales to come …

cc: FB | Logical Graphs • Laws of Form • Mathstodon • Academia.edu
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Topology, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Logical Graphs • Discussion 5

  1. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.