Systems of Interpretation • Discussion 1

Re: FB | Systems SciencesEsteban Trev

ET:
What is the difference between sign and symbol?

In Peirce’s usage, “sign” is the generic term, covering all species or types of signs.  Signs are “symbolic” to the extent they mean what they do solely by virtue of being interpreted to do so.  In Peirce’s fully triadic semiotics all signs are symbolic to some degree, even when they have the additional properties required to qualify them as “icons”, “indices”, or more specialized types.

Resources

cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | SemeioticsMathstodonLaws of FormAcademia.edu

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Interpretive Frameworks, Logic, Logical Graphs, Objective Frameworks, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems of Interpretation, Triadic Relations, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Systems of Interpretation • Discussion 1

  1. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.