Monthly Archives: August 2022

Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 5

Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • In Medias Res Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • Flashback Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 4 A quick review of the highlights so far, and then I’ll continue from the standpoint I indicated last time.  As … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, Initiative, Inquiry | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Higher Order Sign Relations • Discussion 4

Re: Higher Order Sign Relations • Discussion 3 Re: Conceptual Graphs • Gary Zhu GZ: Is there any good contemporary reading of Peirce & James that you recommend?  Their original works have been quite challenging for me. Dear Gary, As … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Peirce, Quotation, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Higher Order Sign Relations • Discussion 3

Re: Higher Order Sign Relations • Discussion 2 Re: Relations, Types, Functions Re: Cybernetics • Cliff Joslyn CJ: Categorical approaches to systems theory have been very attractive to me for a long time.  My current work is categorically adjacent, and … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Peirce, Quotation, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 4

Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • In Medias Res Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • Flashback Re: FB Comment • Daniel Everett Dan Everett commented on my post about Russell’s question, “How shall we describe the logical form of a belief?”, giving … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, Initiative, Inquiry | Tagged , , | 8 Comments