Re: Laws of Form • Lyle Anderson

LA:

All I am asking is what is your definition of in relation to ‌.  So far I have is what one has to do to get from to or from to ‌.  Is that all there is to it?  If that is the case, then what you are really dealing with is some flavor of Lattice Theory.

Dear Lyle,

Standing back for a moment to take in the Big Picture, what we’re doing here is taking all the things we would normally do in a “calculus of many variables” setting with spaces like:

and functoring that whole business over to in other words, cranking the analogies as far as we can push them to spaces like:

A few analogies are bound to break in transit through the Real-Bool barrier, once familiar constructions morph into new-fangled configurations, and other distinctions collapse or “condense” as Spencer Brown called it.  Still enough structure gets preserved overall to reckon the result a kindred subject.

To be continued …

cc: Category Theory • Cybernetics • Ontolog • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
cc: FB | Differential Logic • Laws of Form