Re: Laws of Form • Lyle Anderson
- All I am asking is what is your definition of in relation to . So far I have is what one has to do to get from to or from to . Is that all there is to it? If that is the case, then what you are really dealing with is some flavor of Lattice Theory.
Standing back for a moment to take in the Big Picture, what we’re doing here is taking all the things we would normally do in a “calculus of many variables” setting with spaces like:
and functoring that whole business over to in other words, cranking the analogies as far as we can push them to spaces like:
A few analogies are bound to break in transit through the Real-Bool barrier, once familiar constructions morph into new-fangled configurations, and other distinctions collapse or “condense” as Spencer Brown called it. Still enough structure gets preserved overall to reckon the result a kindred subject.
To be continued …
cc: Category Theory • Cybernetics • Ontolog • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
cc: FB | Differential Logic • Laws of Form
Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Differential Logic • Discussion 11 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry