Peirce’s Categories • 13

Re: Peirce ListRobert Marty

With a few choice exceptions I have always found Peirce’s earlier writings on categories, relations, and semiotics to be more clear, exact, and fruitful in practice than his last attempts to explain himself without the requisite logical and mathematical supports.

Still, I like Robert Marty’s “podium” picture of the universal categories, comprehend it all or not, and I found myself once using a similar picture to explain the relationships among the big 3 normative sciences of aesthetics, ethics, and logic.  I called this “The Pragmatic Cosmos”, using cosmos in the sense of a global order.  It looks like most of this stuff has fallen off the live web but here’s a few links I found.

I’ll copy and format pieces of this to my blog as I get time.

Resources

cc: CyberneticsOntolog ForumPeirce ListStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Abstraction, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Phenomenology, Pragmatic Maxim, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Triadic Relations, Triadicity, Type Theory and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Peirce’s Categories • 13

  1. Pingback: Peirce’s Categories • 15 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Precursors Of Category Theory • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.