Definition and Determination • 17

Re: Ontolog ForumRichard McCullough

RM:  We clearly have some differences in the “definition” of “definition”.

I suppose it all depends on the sorts of things one wants to define, something we might call the context of application.  I am not as much focused on using an ontology as a large online lexicon as I am on the task of acquiring scientific knowledge, so the sorts of things I need to define are complex systems of relationships, the formal or mathematical models we use as intermediate objects to deal with phenomena and the realities producing those phenomena.

Objects like that, intermediate and ultimate, typically have such high levels of complexity we are forced to approach them in stages, often beginning with “toy worlds” in the classic AI fashion.  Those are the sorts of definitions I am after.  We could call them specifications if it helps to use another word.


cc: Ontolog Forum

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Constraint, Definition, Determination, Extension, Form, Geometry, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Indication, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intension, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Topology and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Definition and Determination • 17

  1. Pingback: Survey of Definition and Determination • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.