Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry : 4

Re: Facebook DiscussionSteven Wallis

Peirce sought to understand what all varieties of inquiry, ranging from everyday reasoning and problem solving to full-fledged scientific method, have in common.  Taking a cue from Aristotle he developed a model of inquiry that recognized three independent types of inference — abductive, deductive, inductive.

There is a different type of inferential gap or leap involved in each type of inference.  In the wild, all three types of inference are taking place all the time, interweaving in parallel and series on many fronts at once.  In order of logical priority, however, we usually think of the abductive leap as starting the ball rolling.

Reference

This entry was posted in Abduction, Analogy, Aristotle, Artificial Intelligence, Computation, Computational Complexity, Deduction, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Logic, Peirce, Problem Solving, Semiotics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry : 4

  1. Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s