Tag Archives: Visualization

Theme One • A Program Of Inquiry 6

Posted on February 28, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Programs are algorithms operating on data structures (Niklaus Wirth).  How do we turn abstract graphs like those used by Charles S. Peirce and G. Spencer Brown into concrete data structures algorithms can manipulate?  There are many ways to do this, but one … Continue reading →

Posted in Algorithms, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cognition, Computation, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Data Structures, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Formal Languages, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Learning Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Survey of Theme One Program • 2

Posted on February 25, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts relating to the Theme One Program I worked on all through the 1980s.  The aim was to develop fundamental algorithms and data structures to support an integrated learning and reasoning interface, … Continue reading →

Posted in Algorithms, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cognition, Computation, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Data Structures, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Formal Languages, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Learning Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 20 Comments

Inquiry Driven Systems • Comment 2

Posted on February 21, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

I just got reminded of an earlier blog post that more or less fits here.  It links to the bibliography I had in hand and mind when I went back to graduate school in systems engineering to synthesize all the … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Learning Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Peirce, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Inquiry Driven Systems • Comment 1

Posted on February 18, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Daniel Everett • Edwina Taborsky The role of acquired knowledge bases in inquiry, learning, and reasoning is discussed in the following article and sections. Introduction to Inquiry Driven Systems Inquiry Learning Transfer Testing cc: Peirce List … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Knowledge Bases, Learning, Logic, Peirce, Reasoning, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Animated Logical Graphs • 12

Posted on January 31, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Facebook Discussion • Meredith Bricken Mills I’ve always been fond of picture proofs — it was one of the things that drew me to graph theory, topology, and the logical graphs of C.S. Peirce and Spencer Brown in the first place.  … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Animated Logical Graphs • 11

Posted on January 30, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Richard Coyne • Inside Out Logic Venn diagrams make for very iconic representations of their universes of discourse.  That is one of the main sources of their intuitive utility and also the main source of their logical limitations — … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Differential Logic • Comment 3

Posted on December 30, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

In my previous comment on boundaries in object universes and venn diagrams, and always when I’m being careful about their mathematical senses, the definitions of “topology” and “boundary” I have in mind can be found in any standard textbook.  Here are … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Computational Complexity, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Differential Logic • Comment 2

Posted on December 28, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

As always, we have to distinguish between the diagram itself, the representation or sign inscribed in some medium, and the formal object it represents under a given interpretation. A venn diagram is an iconic sign we use to represent a … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Computational Complexity, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Differential Logic • Comment 1

Posted on December 21, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Gil Kalai • Pivotal Variables Just a tangential association with respect to logical influence and pivotability.  I have been exploring questions related to pivotal variables (“Differences that Make a Difference” or “Difference In ⟹ Difference Out”) via logical analogues … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Computational Complexity, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Logic, Logical Graphs, Logical Influence, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Pivotal Variables, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Peirce’s 1903 Lowell Lectures • Comment 10

Posted on December 16, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussion • John Sowa JFS: In the Lowell Lectures [1903] Peirce defined the Sheet of Assertion as the representation of a universe that was constructed during a discourse between Graphist and Grapheus. But that is just one … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce List, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment