Definition and Determination • 3

Re: Peirce List • Rafe Champion (1) (2)

Where to begin?  Perhaps in the middle …

In the early 90s — having spent a quarter of a century acquiring a bachelor’s in “Mathematical and Philosophical Method”, a master’s in mathematics, and master’s in psychology — I returned to grad school in a Systems Engineering program with the aim of “unifying the manifold” of unfinished projects I had begun in the years gone by.

My study of Peirce went back to my freshman year in college and many of my unfinished projects involved the development and extension of his ideas in one way or another.  The application to grad school asked for a statement of my current research interests.  I wrote out an eighty page essay, of which I submitted 20 pages plus a 20 page bibliography, being what I considered the more settled part of the overall vision.

There’s a copy of that here:

That may provide an indication of what I still regard as worthy goals but of course few people will ever read much of that, so I’ll make the old college try to succintify it as we go.

cc: Inquiry List • Peirce List (1) (2) (3)

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Peirce, Phenomenology, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Definition and Determination • 2

Recent discussions have brought to mind a number of persistent problems in pragmatic thought, especially if we aim to apply Peirce’s conceptions to real practical effect in understanding pressing real-world phenomena.  Among the host of issues, the following two objectives rise to the fore.

  1. To clarify the concept of a sign relation to the point where a full-fledged theory of signs can be developed on the basis of the resulting definition.
  2. To comprehend semiosis, that is, the variety of sign processes, in a fully dynamic fashion, by augmenting the bare definition of a sign relation with a temporal dimension and the capacity to formulate laws of possibly goal-oriented temporal evolution.

Anyway, that’s the plan.

But I have a bunch of wikifying or maybe blogging to do before I can get back to work on the substantial issues.

cc: Inquiry List • Peirce List (1) (2) (3)

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Peirce, Phenomenology, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Definition and Determination • 1

It looks like we might be due for one of our recurring reviews on the closely related subjects of definition and determination, with special reference to what Peirce himself wrote on the topics.

Arisbe List Archive

Here is a collection of excerpts on the subject of determination, mostly from Peirce but with a sampling of thoughts from other thinkers before and after him, on account of the larger questions of determinacy I was pursuing at the time

Collection Of Source Materials

One naturally looks to the Baldwin and Century dictionaries for Peirce-connected definitions of definition but I’d like to start with a series of texts I think are closer to Peirce’s own thoughts on definition, where he is not duty-bound to give a compendious account of every significant thinker’s point of view.  It may be a while before I get all the excerpts copied out.

cc: Inquiry List • Peirce List (1) (2) (3)

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Peirce, Phenomenology, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Details, Details, Details

The difference between the devil and the divinity may lie in the details, but it’s not unusual for the devil to decoy us with detail after detail, when the unexamined premiss is the screen behind which the real deil lies.

These reflections arose by way of meditation on the following blog post —

Peter CameronStudent Questionnaires

I didn’t mean to go all Cassandroid about it — we all know that prophecy, especially when true, is more a curse than a blessing — but I’m all out of time to exegeticize the musement today, so let me just drop a couple of clues as to what I’m talking about —

Diane RavitchWhat is NCTQ?

Diane RavitchWhy Do We Treat the Tests as Scientific Instruments?

I continue to continue …

The tests themselves — good, bad, but mostly ugly — are a diversionary maneuver. The end-run we should be watching is the sneaking shift in the locus of evaluation and therefore control.

A couple of articles pertaining to the Great Education Deformation on the U.S. scene —

John Ewing • Mathematical Intimidation : Driven by the Data

Valerie Strauss • Leading Mathematician Debunks ‘Value-Added’

Naturally, Neyman blames Pearson.

Posted in Commerce, Differential Logic, Governance, Inquiry | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Prime Movers of Disaster Capitalism

☠ Obscenely Rich Corporations (ORCs)
⇒ Corporate Owned Governments (COGs)
⇒ Mercantile Engineered Social Starvation (MESS)
⇒ Corporate Owned Biosphere Wasting Earth’s Bounty (COBWEB)

Posted in Democracy, Education, Governance, Open Access Research, The Big Picture | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments

Inquiry Live and Logic Live

Prompted by observations I made over a long period of time about the problems of fragmentation and increasing insularity in web communities and inspired in part by discussions I had with Michel Bauwens of the Peer2Peer (P2P) Foundation, I started a project a few years ago intended to explore architectural solutions to those problems while developing a body of useful content in the process.

As I reflected on the architecture demanded by the task, needed at least to make a good beginning at organizing the available resources, it took on the shape of an elliptical orbit, with the locus of topic nodes revolving around two ruling foci, called Inquiry and Logic, respectively.

Still exploring the possibilities for architecture and information in parallel, I created two focal wiki pages called Inquiry Live and Logic Live.

The Live bit indicated a couple of design goals I had in mind at the time — an emphasis on inter-activity and the use of animations to illustrate proofs in logical graphs.  I ramified the Logic focus by developing a syllabus of logical topics and then I mirrored and interlinked the whole structure across a number of wiki sites, regarded as peer installations.

Well, you know how it goes, I got pulled away by the exigencies of life and unfinished business in other areas, so it has been Spring of 2010 since I had much chance to work on things there.  To make a long story short, our recent animadversions on Boole, Frege, and Peirce did have the beneficial side-effect of leading me back to that niche of the web and upgrading the content, format, and links.  So be invited to take a gander if you’re into any of those things.

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Modus Dolens

A yet innominate mode of inference has become so frequent in certain quarters that the time has come to fashion a suitable name for it. The scheme of thought in question goes a bit like this:

If A, then B.
Not B.
──────────────────
But A simply has to be ❢❢❢

I know some scholars will insist that it ought to be called “modus dolendo dolens” or something like that, but let’s not be pedantic.

Posted in Humor, Logic, Rhetoric | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

What Peirce Preserves

Re: Peirce ListOn Peirce Preservation
Cf: Inquiry ListWhat Peirce Preserves

Looking back from this moment, I think I see things a little differently.  The critical question is whether our theoretical description of inquiry gives us a picture that is true to life, preserving the life of inquiry and serving to guide us on its way, or whether it “murders to dissect”, leaving us with nothing but a Humpty Dumpty hodge‑podge of false idols and torn and twisted bits of maps that mislead the quest at every turn.

There is a natural semantics that informs mathematical inquiry.  It permeates the actual practice even of those who declare for some variety of nominal faith in their idle off‑hours.  Peirce is unique in his ability to articulate the full dimensionality of mathematical meaning but echoes of his soundings keep this core sense reverberating, however muted, throughout pragmatism.

If I sift the traditions of theoretical reflection on mathematics according to how well their theoretical images manage to preserve this natural stance on mathematical meaning, I would tend to sort Frege more in a class with Boole, De Morgan, Peirce, and Schröder, since I have the sense when I read them they are all talking like mathematicians, not like people who are alien to mathematics.

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

❃ Blowin’ in the Wind ❃

❃ Blowin' in the Wind ❃

It was so windy today, 30 mph gusts at times, that I had to take a chair out on the deck and wait for moments when the tree held still for half a second.

Posted in Photo | Tagged | Leave a comment

If the People are to Rule then the People must become Wise

Our Enlightenment Forerunners had the insight to see the critical flaw in all historical failures at democratic government, to wit, or not — If the People are to Rule then the People must become Wise.

The consequence is that equally distributed education and information are not just commodities you buy so you and yours can get ahead of them and theirs — they are essential to the intelligent functioning of government and the public interest.

That is why we are supposed to have universal free public education.  That is why we are meant to have a government operated postal service to enable the free‑flow of information at a nominal fee, not whatever price the market will bear.

Posted in Democracy, Education, Governance, Information | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments