Animated Logical Graphs • 42

Re: Richard J. LiptonLogical Complexity Of Proofs
Re: Animated Logical Graphs • (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) (40) (41)

Praeclarum Theorema Parse Graph

Now that our propositional formula is cast in the form of a graph its evaluation proceeds as a sequence of graphical transformations where each graph in turn belongs to the same formal equivalence class as its predecessor and thus of the first.  The sequence terminates in a canonical graph making it manifest whether the initial formula is identically true by virtue of its form or not.

To be continued …

Reference

  • Leibniz, Gottfried W. (1679–1686?), “Addenda to the Specimen of the Universal Calculus”, pp. 40–46 in G.H.R. Parkinson (ed., trans., 1966), Leibniz : Logical Papers, Oxford University Press, London, UK.

Praeclarum Theorema

Resources

Applications

cc: CyberneticsOntolog • Peirce (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)Structural ModelingSystems

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.