Pragmatic Theory Of Truth • 22

Re: Systems ScienceScott Jackson

Discussions of “thinking and flawed decisions” arising in the Systems Science Working Group naturally brought the topic of Pragmatic Truth and all its bedeviled vicissitudes back to this Peircean’s mind.

I have often observed how belief systems act in a way like immune systems, generating “antibodies” to combat the “antigens” of any ideas beyond their comfort zones.

Elsewhere, I described these phenomena under the heading of Information Resistance.

  • The hardest thing to understand about information is people’s resistance to it.

The locus pragmaticus for the study of belief systems and the impact of information and inquiry on them is C.S. Peirce’s “The Fixation of Belief”.  See the preceding post in this series for comment and links.

Reference

Resources

cc: CyberneticsOntolog • Peirce List (1) (2)Structural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Coherence, Concordance, Congruence, Consensus, Convergence, Correspondence, Dewey, Fixation of Belief, Information, Inquiry, John Dewey, Kant, Logic, Logic of Science, Method, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Truth, Truth Theory, William James and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.