Pragmatic Truth • Discussion 13

Re: FB | Charles S. Peirce SocietyJohn Corcoran

I looked at John Corcoran’s contribution on “Formalizing Pragmatic Truth” but did not see anything near enough what I’d recognize as a pragmatic theory of truth.

Pragmatic inquiry into a candidate concept of truth would begin by applying the pragmatic maxim to clarify the concept as far as possible and a pragmatic definition of truth, should any result, would find its place within Peirce’s theory of logic as formal semiotics, in other words, stated in terms of a formal theory of triadic sign relations.

Resources

cc: Systems ScienceStructural ModelingPeirce ListOntolog ForumCybernetics

This entry was posted in Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Coherence, Concordance, Congruence, Consensus, Convergence, Correspondence, Dewey, Fixation of Belief, Information, Inquiry, John Dewey, Kant, Logic, Logic of Science, Method, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Truth, Truth Theory, William James and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Pragmatic Truth • Discussion 13

  1. Pingback: Pragmatic Theory Of Truth • 19 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Differential Propositional Calculus • Discussion 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.