Tag Archives: Semiosis

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 10

Posted on August 14, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 8 Re: Category Theory • Morgan Rogers MR:  Please clearly state at least one “distinctive quality of sign relations”. Sign relations are triadic relations. Can any triadic relation be a sign relation? I … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 9

Posted on August 14, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Category Theory • Morgan Rogers MR: Okay, I may have mixed up the meanings of “object” and “interpretant” in my plain language translations above?  Re determination, I read “B is determined by A” as meaning the conjunction of and … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 8

Posted on August 13, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty RM: Thank you for reminding me of the definition of a group that I have taught for 45 years … I think you work with the permutations of symmetrical groups that do not fit … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 7

Posted on August 13, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Category Theory • Morgan Rogers MR: Okay, this is hard to parse, but I’ve looked at it a few times now framed with discussion from a few different sources, and it seems that if we fix some sets of signs, … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 3

Posted on August 12, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

It helps me to compare sign relations with my other favorite class of triadic relations, namely, groups.  Applications of mathematical groups came up just recently in the Laws of Form discussion group, so it will save a little formatting time to adapt … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 2

Posted on August 10, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 1 Definitions tend to call on other terms in need of their own definitions, and so on till the process terminates at the level of primitive terms.  The main two concepts requiring supplementation in … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 1

Posted on August 9, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

I opened a topic on Sign Relations in the Logic stream of Category Theory Zulipchat to work on Peirce’s theory of triadic sign relations in a category-theoretic framework. I had been reading Peirce for a decade or more before I found … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relation Theory • Discussion 5

Posted on January 16, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Cybernetics • Cliff Joslyn Re: Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relation Theory • Discussion (3) (4) Dear Cliff, I’m still collecting my wits from the mind-numbing events of the past two weeks so I’ll copy your last remarks here and … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Icon Index Symbol, Information, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relation Theory • Discussion 4

Posted on December 31, 2020 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Previous Post Re: Cybernetics • Cliff Joslyn Dear Cliff, Many thanks for your thoughtful reply.  I copied a transcript to my blog to take up first thing next year.  Here’s hoping we all have a better one! Regards, Jon CJ: … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Icon Index Symbol, Information, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relation Theory • Discussion 3

Posted on December 29, 2020 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Helmut Raulien HR: As Peircean semiotics is a three-valued logic, I think it bears relevance for the discussion about multiple-valued logic. Dear Helmut, The distinction between “k-adic” (involving a span of k dimensions) and “k-tomic” (involving … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Icon Index Symbol, Information, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments