Tag Archives: Laws of Form

Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 20

Posted on September 16, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Laws of Form • James Bowery JB: I’m interested in those who have approached the notion of self‑duality from the meta‑perspective of switching perspectives between Directed Cyclic Graphs of NiNAND and NiNOR gates (Ni for N‑Inputs à la boolean … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, Analogy, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Deduction, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Logic, Duality, Form, Graph Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Time, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 19

Posted on September 10, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Laws of Form • James Bowery JB: I’m interested in those who have approached the notion of self‑duality from the meta‑perspective of switching perspectives between Directed Cyclic Graphs of NiNAND and NiNOR gates (Ni for N‑Inputs à la boolean … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, Analogy, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Deduction, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Logic, Duality, Form, Graph Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Time, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 18

Posted on September 7, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Laws of Form • James Bowery JB: I’m interested in those who have approached the notion of self‑duality from the meta‑perspective of switching perspectives between Directed Cyclic Graphs of NiNAND and NiNOR gates (Ni for N‑Inputs à la boolean … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, Analogy, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Deduction, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Logic, Duality, Form, Graph Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Time, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 17

Posted on August 22, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Laws of Form • James Bowery JB: I’m interested in those who have approached the notion of self‑duality from the meta‑perspective of switching perspectives between Directed Cyclic Graphs of NiNAND and NiNOR gates (Ni for N‑Inputs à la boolean … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, Analogy, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Deduction, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Logic, Duality, Form, Graph Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Time, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Survey of Theme One Program • 7

Posted on May 6, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of resources relating to the Theme One Program I worked on all through the 1980s.  The aim was to develop fundamental algorithms and data structures for integrating empirical learning with logical reasoning.  I had earlier developed … Continue reading →

Posted in Algorithms, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Data Structures, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Formal Languages, Graph Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Learning Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 80 Comments

Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8

Posted on May 2, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts on Logical Graphs, encompassing several families of graph‑theoretic structures originally developed by Charles S. Peirce as graphical formal languages or visual styles of syntax amenable to interpretation for logical applications. Beginnings Logical Graphs … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Computational Complexity, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 77 Comments

Logical Graphs • Discussion 11

Posted on September 19, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Logical Graphs • Formal Development Re: Laws of Form • Lyle Anderson LA: What does it mean to assign a label or name to a node of the Logical Graph? In LoF, the variables of the algebra represent unknown … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Topology, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Logical Graphs • Discussion 10

Posted on September 18, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Logical Graphs • Formal Development Re: Laws of Form • Armahedi Mahzar AM: GSB took J1 : (a(a)) =   as the first algebraic primitive and the second one is transposition so he only need only 2 primitives for … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Topology, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Logical Graphs • Formal Development 8

Posted on September 16, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Exemplary Proofs Using no more than the axioms and theorems recorded so far, it is possible to prove a multitude of much more complex theorems.  A number of all‑time favorites are linked below. Peirce’s Law Blog Series • (1) • … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Deduction, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Semiotics, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Logical Graphs • Formal Development 7

Posted on September 15, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Frequently Used Theorems (concl.) C3.  Dominant Form Theorem The third of the frequently used theorems of service to this survey is one Spencer Brown annotates as Consequence 3 (C3) or Integration.  A better mnemonic might be dominance and recession theorem (DART), but … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Deduction, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Semiotics, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments