Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • Discussion 2

Re: Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • 1
Re: Cybernetics ListLou Kauffman

LK:
I am writing to comment that there are some quite interesting situations that generalize the De Morgan Duality.

One well-known one is this.  Let \mathbb{R}^* denote the real numbers with a formal symbol @, denoting infinity, adjoined so that:

\begin{array}{cccccl}  @ & + & @ & = & @ & \\  @ & + & 0 & = & @ & \\  @ & + & x & = & @ & \text{when}~ x ~\text{is an ordinary real number} \\  1 & \div & @ & = & 0  \end{array}

(Of course you cannot do anything with @ or the system collapses.  One can easily give the constraints.)

Define \lnot x = 1/x.

x + y = \text{usual sum otherwise.}

Define x * y = xy/(x+y) = 1/((1/x) + (1/y)).

Then we have x*y = \lnot (\lnot x + \lnot y), so that the system (\mathbb{R}^*, \lnot, +, *) satisfies De Morgan duality and it is a Boolean algebra when restricted to \{ 0, @ \}.

Note also that \lnot fixes 1 and -1.  This algebraic system occurs of course in electrical calculations and also in the properties of tangles in knot theory, as you can read in the last part of my included paper “Knot Logic”.  I expect there is quite a bit more about this kind of duality in various (categorical) places.

Thanks, Lou, there’s a lot to think about here, so I’ll need to study it a while.  Just off hand, the embedding into reals brings up a vague memory of the very curious way Peirce defines negation in his 1870 “Logic of Relatives”.  I seem to recall it involving a power series, but it’s been a while so I’ll have to look it up again.

Regards,

Jon

cc: FB | Logical GraphsLaws of FormMathstodonAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • Discussion 2

  1. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Systems Community of Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.