Paradisaical Logic and the After Math • Comment 2

Posted on April 7, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Mauro Bertani

Dear Mauro,

My access to the internet is limited today — maybe I can make a start toward addressing your comments by linking to an article on “sole sufficient operators” in boolean algebra and propositional calculus.

There’s more information about Peirce’s “amphecks”, tantamount to what we now call Nand and Nnor, in the following article.

Resources

cc: Cybernetics • Ontolog • Peirce List (1) (2) • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
cc: FB | Logical Graphs • Laws of Form

This entry was posted in Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Critical Thinking, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Paradisaical Logic and the After Math • Comment 2

  1. Pingback: Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.