Signspiel • 1

Re: Ontolog ForumJohn Sowa

All sorts of players have given us all sorts of spiel about speech acts over the years but Peirce stands out from the chorus in giving us models of semiotic processes whose generation by triadic sign relations allows them to maintain a constant relation among signs, their active interpretants in conduct, and their ultimate pragmata, the objects and objectives of the whole action.  Shy of that, the spielerei of Austin and Wittgenstein simply never gets off the ground.

cc: FB | Semeiotics • Laws of Form • OntologMathstodonAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Logic, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Signspiel • 1

  1. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.