Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 1

Re: CyberneticsStuart Umpleby

Susan and I just returned from our annual dramatic immersion in Stratford Ontario and the last play we saw was a playfully dramatic rendition of Milton’s Paradise Lost.

That and the spectacular immorality play currently embroiling Washington DC moved me to meditate on the differences that narratives bear in relation to their objects — their objectives, intentions, goals, and aims — especially the difference between narratives aiming at the truth which sets us free and narratives propagating the lies which enslave humanity.

Resources

cc: CyberneticsOntolog ForumStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Information Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Representation, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Systems, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.