Readings On Determination

This is an anchor post for a set of readings on determination.  They focus on the census of senses that Peirce employed in his pragmatic approach to information, inquiry, science, and signs with a pinch of readings from other writers for historical and contemporary context.

I will start with a set of readings I collected some 20 years ago.  Once that groundwork is laid down, there is a set of ideas coming from the relational programming paradigm in computer science that I think would mesh nicely with Peirce’s theory of information and could be extended to cover the triadic relations of his semiotics.

Resource

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Comprehension, Computer Science, Constraint, Definition, Determination, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Extension, Form, Information, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Prigogine, Relation Theory, Relational Programming, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Structure, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Readings On Determination

  1. I’ll be especially interested in following this. As I’m always hungering for spoilers, how do you see this fitting in with non-monotonic reasoning systems in CS &/or AI?

    • Jon Awbrey says:

      That’s a very mixed bag.  I followed that literature many years ago until one of the most prolix streams started spouting nonsense.  As I recall, not always a good bet, my criticism had to do with the fact that few of them grasped how often deductive knowledge bases crash into the ceiling rather than the floor.  I will leave that as a teaser so as not to spoil too much.

    • Jon Awbrey says:

      What I’m really after here has to do with the way that a certain concept of determination figures into Peirce’s better definitions of a sign relation — “better” meaning the definitions that are strong enough to bear the load of a consequential theory.

      That is a very old business with me, and there are developments of it that are still unfinished, but lately I have noticed a number of related issues that are not as clear as they need to be.

  2. Pingback: Readings On Determination • Discussion : 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Readings On Determination • Discussion : 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Definition and Determination : 14 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s