Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 2

Re: Peirce ListHelmut Raulien

In systems theory and engineering there is a well-recognized duality or complementarity between the dimensions of Control and Information, frequently cast in terms of action and perception, actuators and detectors, effectors and sensors, and a variety of other aliases.  There we find the dual devices of reachability matrices, representing the operations it takes to put a system in a given state, and observability matrices, representing the operations it takes to identify a system as being in a given state.

The appearance of matrices at this point, understood in the sense of 2-dimensional arrays of coefficients, may give us a clue to the dyadic character of the analysis and design models issuing from them.  And yet there is every opportunity in systems theory and engineering to open up the additional “elbow room” that triadic relations provide.

Resources

cc: Category TheoryCyberneticsOntologStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | Relation TheoryLaws of FormPeirce List

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.