Tag Archives: Semiotics

Definition and Determination • 21

Posted on May 6, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Definition and Determination • (18) • (19) • (20) Re: FB | The Ecology of Systems Thinking • Richard Saunders RS: Don’t you think some little bit of unconscious knowledge and logic comes preloaded, à priori, courtesy of our parents … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Peirce, Phenomenology, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Definition and Determination • 20

Posted on May 5, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty RM: Thank you for this information.  I happen to have a work in progress (not yet written) on the question of determination.  I discovered that Peirce gave a quite remarkable definition in CP 8.361. “We … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Peirce, Phenomenology, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Definition and Determination • 19

Posted on May 3, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Edwina Taborsky JA: I needed to start thinking of semiotics and sign relations in the light of cybernetics and systems theory.  That required me to convert from understanding a sign relation as a relation among three … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Peirce, Phenomenology, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Definition and Determination • 18

Posted on May 2, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Various discussions in sundry places led me by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to the environs of old notes I gathered on the topics of Definition and Determination, that being on the occasion of a return to graduate school … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Peirce, Phenomenology, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 5

Posted on April 11, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: Peirce List (1) (2) • John Sowa (1) (2) Re: Peirce List • Jon Alan Schmidt JAS: Thanks for providing a longer excerpt of that passage than I did, including Peirce’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 4

Posted on April 10, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: Laws of Form • Lyle Anderson LA: Here Peirce is confusing Truth and Falsity with Good and Evil.  The Creator of the Universe (CotU) created Truth and Falsity when He drew the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 3

Posted on April 8, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: FB | Medieval Logic • Kollbjorn Oldtheyn Dear Kollbjorn, I used to think I knew what Peirce was talking about in this passage but it looks like it may be time … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 2

Posted on April 8, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: FB | Medieval Logic • Kollbjorn Oldtheyn Dear Kollbjorn, The way I understand Peirce’s parable, he is asking, “How do we arrive at a condition far enough removed from our immersion … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 1

Posted on April 8, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: Paradisaical Logic and the After Math • Comment (1) (2) I am getting a feeling I occasionally get when discussing Peirce’s work in a group setting — as though we had … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paradisaical Logic and the After Math • Comment 2

Posted on April 7, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Mauro Bertani Dear Mauro, My access to the internet is limited today — maybe I can make a start toward addressing your comments by linking to an article on “sole sufficient operators” in boolean algebra and … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Critical Thinking, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment