Tag Archives: Relation Theory

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes • 16

Posted on June 25, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • JA • JFS JFS: For those of us who are trying to convince modern students to study Peirce, we need to become bilingual.  We need to show how his terminology and notations map to and from … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Chomsky, Complementarity, Dewey, Formal Languages, Inquiry, Laws of Form, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Philosophy, Physics, Pragmatism, Quantum Mechanics, Relation Theory, Relativity, Science, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes • 15

Posted on June 24, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • JA • GF One could hardly dispute the importance of logical implication relations like   Their set-theoretic analogues are subset relations like which are almost the canonical way of expressing constraint, determination, information, and so on.  … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, Automata, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Chomsky, Dewey, Formal Languages, Inquiry, Laws of Form, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Philosophy, Physics, Pragmatism, Quantum Mechanics, Relation Theory, Relativity, Science, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes • 14

Posted on June 24, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • JA • JFS We find ourselves at the thresh‑old of yet another recurring discussion, this time concerning Peirce’s use of the adjectives formal and quasi‑necessary with normative connotations, all of which I think is clear from … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Chomsky, Complementarity, Dewey, Formal Languages, Inquiry, Laws of Form, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Philosophy, Physics, Pragmatism, Quantum Mechanics, Relation Theory, Relativity, Science, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes • 13

Posted on June 22, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

I would like to return to a point where the paths of discussion began to diverge and then bifurcated so chaotically that I could not track them further, namely, here: Re: Peirce List • JA • GF • JA I … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Chomsky, Complementarity, Dewey, Formal Languages, Inquiry, Laws of Form, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Philosophy, Physics, Pragmatism, Quantum Mechanics, Relation Theory, Relativity, Science, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes • 12

Posted on June 20, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Kirsti Määttänen I have a sense of what Peirce meant by the “Logic of Science” and what Dewey meant by calling Logic the “Theory of Inquiry”.  If that’s logic in the narrow sense and not Logic … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Complementarity, Dewey, Formal Languages, Inquiry, Laws of Form, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Philosophy, Physics, Pragmatism, Quantum Mechanics, Relation Theory, Relativity, Science, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes • 11

Posted on June 17, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Kirsti Määttänen • Jon Awbrey • John Sowa The most important difference between linguistics and logic is that linguistics is descriptive while logic is normative. Yes, some grammarians try to treat grammar as prescriptive, but most … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Chomsky, Complementarity, Formal Languages, Inquiry, Laws of Form, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Philosophy, Physics, Pragmatism, Quantum Mechanics, Relation Theory, Relativity, Science, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes • 10

Posted on June 16, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Jon Alan Schmidt JA: As I am realizing more and more in recent years, analyzing and classifying signs as a substitute for analyzing and classifying objects is the first slip of a slide into nominalism, namely, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Chomsky, Complementarity, Formal Languages, Inquiry, Laws of Form, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Philosophy, Physics, Pragmatism, Quantum Mechanics, Relation Theory, Relativity, Science, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes • 9

Posted on June 13, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List | Jay Zeman • JFS • GF • GF • GF • GR • JA • JA • JA • GF • JA • GR • JFS Re: Peirce List | Rheme and Reason • JA • … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Complementarity, Inquiry, Laws of Form, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Scientific Method, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Icon Index Symbol • 17

Posted on May 9, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed For Signs Re: Peirce List (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) • Helmut Raulien Our object being to clarify the relationships among icons, indices, and symbols, I believe the maximum benefit possible at this point is … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Algorithms, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Computation, Data Structures, Deduction, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Interpretive Frameworks, Knowledge Representation, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

Icon Index Symbol • 16

Posted on May 6, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed For Signs Re: Peirce List (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) • Jon Alan Schmidt • Helmut Raulien Having lost my train of thought due to a week on the road, I would like to go … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Algorithms, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Computation, Data Structures, Deduction, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Interpretive Frameworks, Knowledge Representation, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments