Tag Archives: Mathematics

Signs Of Signs • 2

Posted on March 18, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Michael Harris • Language About Language I compared mathematics to a “consensual hallucination”, like virtual reality, and I continue to believe that the aim is to get (consensually) to the point where that hallucination is a second nature. I … Continue reading →

Posted in Aesthetics, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Coherentism, Communication, Connotation, Form, Formal Languages, Foundations of Mathematics, Higher Order Propositions, Illusion, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Interpretation, Interpretive Frameworks, Logic, Mathematics, Objective Frameworks, Objectivism, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Pragmatics, Pragmatism, Recursion, Reflection, Semantics, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Syntax, Translation, Triadic Relations, Type Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Signs Of Signs • 1

Posted on March 16, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Michael Harris • Language About Language There is a language and a corresponding literature treating logic and mathematics as related species of communication and information gathering, namely, the pragmatic‑semiotic tradition transmitted through the lifelong efforts of C.S. Peirce.  It is … Continue reading →

Posted in Aesthetics, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Coherentism, Communication, Connotation, Form, Formal Languages, Foundations of Mathematics, Higher Order Propositions, Illusion, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Interpretation, Interpretive Frameworks, Logic, Mathematics, Objective Frameworks, Objectivism, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Pragmatics, Pragmatism, Recursion, Reflection, Semantics, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Syntax, Translation, Triadic Relations, Type Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Cactus Language • Overview 4

Posted on March 12, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

Depending on whether a formal language is called by the type of sign it enlists or the type of object its signs denote, a cactus language may be called a sentential calculus or a propositional calculus, respectively. When the syntactic … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Formal Grammars, Formal Languages, Graph Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Cactus Language • Overview 3

Posted on March 7, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

In the development of Cactus Language to date the following two species of graphs have been instrumental. Painted And Rooted Cacti (PARCAI). Painted And Rooted Conifers (PARCOI). It suffices to begin with the first class of data structures, developing their … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Formal Grammars, Formal Languages, Graph Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Cactus Language • Overview 2

Posted on March 6, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

In order to facilitate the use of propositions as indicator functions it helps to acquire a flexible notation for referring to propositions in that light, for interpreting sentences in a corresponding role, and for negotiating the requirements of mutual sense … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Formal Grammars, Formal Languages, Graph Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Cactus Language • Overview 1

Posted on March 1, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

Thus, what looks to us like a sphere of scientific knowledge more accurately should be represented as the inside of a highly irregular and spiky object, like a pincushion or porcupine, with very sharp extensions in certain directions, and virtually … Continue reading →

Posted in Automata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Equational Inference, Formal Grammars, Formal Languages, Graph Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Riffs and Rotes • Happy New Year 2025

Posted on January 1, 2025 by Jon Awbrey

No information is lost by dropping the terminal 1s.  Thus we may write the following form. The article linked below tells how forms of that sort correspond to a family of digraphs called riffs and a family of graphs called … Continue reading →

Posted in Algebra, Arithmetic, Combinatorics, Computation, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Logic, Mathematics, Number Theory, Recursion, Representation, Riffs and Rotes, Semiotics, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Differential Propositional Calculus • 37

Posted on December 31, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Foreshadowing Transformations • Extensions and Projections of Discourse And, despite the care which she took to look behind her at every moment, she failed to see a shadow which followed her like her own shadow, which stopped when she stopped, … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Topology, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Differential Propositional Calculus • 36

Posted on December 30, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Transformations of Discourse It is understandable that an engineer should be completely absorbed in his speciality, instead of pouring himself out into the freedom and vastness of the world of thought, even though his machines are being sent off to … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Topology, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Differential Propositional Calculus • 35

Posted on December 29, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Example 2. Drives and Their Vicissitudes (concl.) Applied to the example of ‑gear curves, the indexing scheme results in the data of the next two Tables, showing one period for each orbit. The states in each orbit are listed as … Continue reading →

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Topology, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments