Re: Pragmatic Truth • Discussion 26
Re: FB | Cybersemiotics • Richard Saunders
- RS:
- Agreed, but given those qualifications (the perspective on facts qualified by the pragmatic maxim and the perspective on correspondence qualified by irreducible triadic relations) the pragmatic theory of truth is still a specialized correspondence theory.
Dear Richard,
It is always possible to expand the coverage of any term until it becomes vacuous, but that is not the sense in which “correspondence theory of truth” is normally used. The usual suspects are always dyadic relations, the “mirror of nature”, Russell’s “isomorphism theory”, and iconographies of that ilk.
Resources
cc: FB | Inquiry Driven Systems • Laws of Form • Mathstodon • Academia.edu
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Pragmatic Truth • Discussion 28 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 7 | Systems Community of Inquiry