Transformations of Logical Graphs • 7

Semiotic Transformations

Re: Transformations of Logical Graphs • (4)(5)(6)

Our investigation has brought us to the point of seeing both a transformation group and a triadic sign relation in the duality between entitative and existential interpretations of logical graphs.

Given the level of the foregoing abstractions it helps to anchor them in concrete structural experience.  In that spirit we’ve been pursuing the case of a group action T : X \to X and a sign relation L \subseteq O \times X \times X where O is the set of boolean functions on two variables and X is a set of logical graphs denoting those functions.  We drew up a Table combining the aspects of both structures and sorted it according to the orbits T induces on X and consequently on O.

\text{Interpretive Duality as Sign Relation} \stackrel{_\bullet}{} \text{Orbit Order}

Interpretive Duality as Sign Relation • Orbit Order

In the next few posts we’ll take up the orbits of logical graphs one by one, comparing and contrasting their syntax and semantics.

Resources

cc: FB | Logical GraphsLaws of Form • Mathstodon • Academia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Interpretive Duality, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Transformations of Logical Graphs • 7

  1. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Transformations of Logical Graphs • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Transformations of Logical Graphs • 9 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Transformations of Logical Graphs • 10 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.